Jump to content

Talk:Quince

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Quince/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 10:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 03:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, @Chiswick Chap: I'll be reviewing this article for the January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive.

Many thanks!

Intro

[edit]

Good!

Description

[edit]

Made and edit you may wish to review.

  • All right.

History

[edit]

Added a link you may wish to review.

  • Tweaked.

Cultivation

[edit]

Good!

Uses

[edit]

I made an edit you may wish to review.

  • Tweaked.

Cultural associations

[edit]

Good!


Inital Review

Another great article with minimum alterations needing to be made. I will await your reply before posting my final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done.

Sources

[edit]

[11] I am not sure why this is here. It references another Wikipedia article, Theophrastus, and that article does not mention quince, then following a link to his Enquiry into Plants, that doesn't mention quince either. Consider removal?

  • It's certainly a relevant fact, and it's supported by a full and (on inspection) correct citation to a chapter and section of Theophrastus's book. There is no reason why such a fact should be in the biography or book article, as these cover much broader subjects.

[28] The archived, original link is dead. BigChrisKenney (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Link is marked as such.