Talk:Absolute pitch

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Absolute pitch article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

Music theory Mid‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Introduction's claim that absolute pitch implies/entails relative pitch

As an absolute pitch haver this seems very dubious. I would go as far as to say that because of having had absolute pitch my entire life, I have *no* relative pitch: if I want to work out an interval, I can't do it without first (automatically) identifying the two notes and then secondly (consciously) calculating the distance between them. The only exceptions are unison and octaves; even a perfect fifth is going to have me first identifying the notes. As I understand it, this is very common for people with absolute pitch (but I have no source hence the talk page post instead of just editing the article) Anditres (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is definitely incorrect, and contradicts the citation that's given at the end of the paragraph. "However, AP and RP are actually very different modes of musical pitch processing, having incompatible features, and therefore it may be possible that one can interfere the development of the other, and vice versa." I'll amend it. - Rainwarrior (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once a person with absolute pitch becomes familiar with the names of the musical notes including there octaves the difference between absolute and relative pitch becomes more obvious.
   A person with absolute pitch doesn't need to guess what note he or she is hearing whilst a person with relative pitch does.
   I learned to play the piano before I learned to read.My teacher gave my mother a paper keyboard to attach to our piano. Both her and my older brother would test me whilst I was in another room. Less than a week or so later I didn't have to guess.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:8D80:5400:9E6C:A0D8:85FF:FEF1:215D (talk) 05:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The time factor

No need to guess. 2605:8D80:5400:9E6C:A0D8:85FF:FEF1:215D (talk) 05:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Eddy Chen to the list of people with absolute pitch

There are no articles stating Chen has perfect pitch. However, he did explicitly state such in their video "Does Charlie Puth REALLY Have Perfect Pitch??" and many other videos. Is it possible to cite YouTube videos in a Wikipedia article if information is explicitly stated, and can YouTube videos be cited if no article is present for the topic? Booklover9876 (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This has already been discussed extensively. A Youtube video with one musician claiming another musician has perfect pitch does not constitute a reliable source. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]